Skip to main content

How we’re making sure all farm businesses can fairly access money released from Basic Payments

Photograph by Alison Day

The government has committed to maintain the farming budget for England at £2.4 billion per year throughout this parliament. This was confirmed again in the recent Spending Review.

Currently, most of the farming budget is spent on Basic Payments – subsidies paid to farmers according to how much land they farm. We will be gradually reducing spending on Basic Payments each year over the next 6 years.

Instead, we will make the money available to farmers through one-off grants for capital investment in equipment and technology, and ongoing payments for environmental actions and related advice and support. Farmers will be able to get paid for a combination of actions that they choose, to suit their farm business, food production and the environment.

We’ll achieve this by:

  • allocating the budget flexibly to respond to demand, and achieve our intended outcomes for farm productivity, environment, climate and animal health and welfare
  • designing schemes to make them accessible and workable for all farmers so that there is a range of choices that works for everyone

Allocating the budget

We set out in the update on the Agricultural Transition Plan last June our high-level plans to spend the money freed up from Direct Payments.

We will not have fixed allocations (or ‘pillars’, as they were known whilst we were in the EU) of money ring fenced to different schemes. Instead, we will learn as we go and find the best ways to manage the overall budget to respond to demand in a way that helps us achieve our intended outcomes. This means we will keep the allocation of funding between different schemes under review over time.

We are already seeing plenty of farmer enthusiasm and action to protect and improve the environment as part of profitable, commercial food producing businesses. We have adjusted our plans to follow increased demand for particular schemes and actions. For example, we have increased our budget for Countryside Stewardship to reflect the recent price increase for most options and the 40% increase in applications we saw last year, so that everyone who applied could join the scheme. We also increased our budget for the new Farming Equipment and Technology Fund to meet demand 3 times higher than our initial budget allocation, so that more than 4,000 farmers could invest in new equipment and technology for their farm business. We will maintain this flexible approach.

There is no gap between taking the money out of Direct Payments and it going back into the sector. Right now, farmers not already in Countryside Stewardship can apply for an agreement to start in January. We have already had our first rounds of the Farming Investment Fund and we’ve just closed the first round of applications for Landscape Recovery projects. The Farming in Protected Landscapes scheme is funding a range of activities on farms in national parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs). We will shortly launch the first iteration of the Sustainable Farming Incentive.

Over the next 3 years (the period covered by the recent government Spending Review), as we reduce Basic Payments we will incrementally roll out the new range of grants and ongoing payments.

We plan to spend the farming budget over the next 3 years as follows:

  • We will continue to gradually phase out subsidies but reallocate all of the funding to maintain the same overall level of investment in the sector.
  • We will spend more than £2.5 billion on the new Sustainable Farming Incentive, Countryside Stewardship and its successor, Local Nature Recovery, and continue to fund existing Environmental Stewardship agreements. We will also spend a small proportion of this budget through the Farming in Protected Landscapes scheme.
  • We expect to spend around £600 million on grants and other support for farmers to invest in productivity, innovation, research and development.
  • We will spend up to £50 million from the farming budget on Landscape Recovery projects (longer-term, larger-scale projects). Landscape Recovery is for those who want to take a more radical, large-scale approach to environmental land management. Farmers are eligible for this scheme, and a key objective for the first round of projects is to test how well the scheme is working for farmers and groups of smaller farms. Round one applications recently closed and most of the 51 bids received are for projects involving groups of farmers and land managers working together. We committed to take forward up to 15 projects in this round, and the learning from it will help us make decisions in future about what proportion of the budget should be allocated to this scheme.
  • Over this period most of the government funding for landscape-scale activities will be through the separately funded Nature for Climate Fund. Farmers can apply and are applying for these two offers, and we are ensuring scheme design continues to support that.
  • Scheme administration costs are funded separately, other than continuing to have a ‘technical assistance’ pot which amounts to less than 1% to 2% of the total budget each year.

Making schemes work for all farm types, sizes, locations and tenancies

We are working with farmers and other experts to design all our new schemes to be accessible to and workable for all farm types, tenancies, sizes and locations.

For example, in the Sustainable Farming Incentive, we’ve:

  • Made the scheme standards flexible, rather than providing detailed and rigid prescriptions, so that farmers can decide how best to meet the standards on their farms
  • Matched that flexibility with a more proportionate and fair set of controls, designed to support farmers to meet the requirements of the scheme but still be effective in responding to the rare cases where there is deliberate / persistent fraud or non-compliance (we’ve also changed the rules in existing schemes to introduce fairer controls and changed the way we do farm visits)
  • Re-balanced the terms and conditions to make them fairer and more workable for farmers
  • Put in place shorter agreement lengths (3 years rather than 5) and provided extra flexibility so that people can add more land, standards and levels of ambition into their agreement each year and so that tenants, including those on 1-year rolling contracts, can come into the scheme and leave early without penalty if they lose management control of their land
  • Made the scheme administration simpler, clearer and faster so that farmers can self-serve and apply at a time that makes sense for them rather than during a fixed application window, and we can process applications and payments quickly, consistently and reliably

We will be looking to apply similar flexibility, fairness and reliability to the design of all our schemes.

We know that farmers need to know how all the schemes will work for them and what funding they will be able to access. We will be publishing more information over the course of this year about this so that farmers can plan ahead.

The Sustainable Farming Incentive offer this year is just the opening offer – we will be expanding the scheme to cover a wider range of actions and levels of ambition over the next 3 years and we’ll publish further details about this later this year.

We’ll be sharing more details this year on how Local Nature Recovery will work for farmers and what sorts of actions it will pay for, and how those in existing agreements will be able to transition smoothly onto the new schemes when they’re ready.

Meanwhile we’d encourage any farmer not already in Countryside Stewardship to take a look at the scheme before this year’s application deadline, along with other schemes currently on offer, including Farming in Protected Landscapes, the England Woodland Creation Offer (where you can be funded for planting and maintaining woodland over as little as 1 hectare of land) and our productivity and innovation, research and development grants.

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by Helen Wordley posted on

    Thank you - always very informative 🙂
    We are in the SFI Pilot and it's good to hear that the scheme will be expanded to embrace a wider range of actions. We would have liked to include within the scheme a woodland creation on a smaller land parcel that EWCO are able to offer and there are a number of items in the Countryside stewardship offer such as wild flower meadows which we would have loved to develop.

  2. Comment by Richard Styles posted on

    As a small family farm producing basic food products that others make into a finished product, like bread and sugar. There is nothing in these schemes that we can apply for. We are in Countryside Stewardship, have been offered a mirror agreement, but do not yet know when this will be 'approved' by the RPA. British Sugar want our area declaration by August this year. When will the RPA give us the green light so we know how to plan? We need to know now!
    I have developed a new oilseed rape drill, There was no help from the RPA with this venture as it fell out of their scope for funding. Wonderful.

    • Replies to Richard Styles>

      Comment by The Team posted on

      Thanks for the feedback, Richard.

      If you could please email your SBI to Sandy Kapila, the RPA’s Customer Director (, he’ll check progress on the CS agreement extension. In terms of FETF we understand that the scope of items wasn’t right for everyone and we are considering options for future rounds.


Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person

By submitting a comment you understand it may be published on this public website. Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform handles your information.